Blogging Insights # 11 – Writing vs Blogging

Tanya is the host of Blogging Insights

writing is the best way to talk without being interrupted

” Writing is the best way to talk without being interrupted.” — Jules Renard

What do you think?


Do I agree?

Of course, I do. Any one would agree with this statement. But it’s not the complete picture, is it?

Writing is a lonely pastime. One can pontificate without being interrupted but we don’t get the benefit of debate. We share our opinions and that is it. What could be counterarguments, we don’t get the benefit of those as till the writing is read by others, they won’t be able to share their opinions.

In comparison, blogging is a different cup of tea altogether. When we write a post and state our opinions, stories, or poems, immediately after posting them, we get feedback from others.

Though we write without interruptions, we do get the advantage of counter-arguments when others share their views on our writing. I think this way we get the best of both worlds. We can say what we want without anyone stopping us or correcting us and yet if we are in the wrong, or our views are outdated, people out there help to set us right.

And thinking along these lines, I would say that blogging is even better than writing books because an author doesn’t know how people would react to their story till the book is completed, published, and sold. While a blogger gets instant feedback and has the advantage when any flaws or discrepancies are caught by their readers and corrected there and then.

Thank you Tanya for this interesting topic for today’s Blogging Insights




35 thoughts on “Blogging Insights # 11 – Writing vs Blogging

  1. Wonderful perspective on that quote. I’d only change it a slight bit (my opinion) in that writing (for me anyway) is never lonely. All those characters ‘talking’ and moving around and wondering what to do and where to go. It’s noisy when I write! 😆🤩🤗

    Liked by 1 person

  2. My lecturer used to state that once writing was in the public domain the reader makes their own interpretation and you loss control of it. So even if the reader can’t provide a counter argument, the piece isn’t stagnant. Meaning evolves in the public sphere. I cite Noddy and Big Ears as an example

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.